Independent thinking. Documented progress.Field notes on working with AI

The person behind the journal

Rachel Kent.

Rachel Kent is a Buffalo-based educator whose work brings together teaching, AI-supported curriculum development and community service.

With about two decades in education, Rachel’s experience spans special education, career and technical education, and curriculum work at Curipod. WBFO interview · Curipod team · University at Buffalo series

Rachel created AI Toolbox for Teachers, a free collection of resources to help education professionals explore generative AI. She also participated in the University at Buffalo’s AI + Education Learning Community Series, contributing to a discussion of the ethical implications of AI in education. These projects connect classroom practice with the questions educators face when bringing new technology into learning. AI Toolbox for Teachers · University at Buffalo series

Her commitment to access extends beyond instructional materials. Rachel founded Good Deed Grocery, a school-based initiative that provided students with free groceries and opportunities to take part in serving their school community. She serves as Curriculum Chair and a board member of Indoor Farming for Kids, connecting her education experience with community-based learning. WBFO interview · IF Kids team

InfoTech WNY named Rachel its Visionary Educator award winner. She was also recognized as a New York State Champion in the Presidential AI Challenge. InfoTech WNY award · State champions

The site is independently produced and is not affiliated with or endorsed by OpenAI, Rachel’s employers or the organizations mentioned here.

Why this journal exists

ChatwithGPT is Rachel Kent’s independent learning journal. It turns measurable AI-workspace accomplishments into a growing collection of practical lessons for AI professionals and curious readers. The site is prepared with AI assistance, and its editorial policy explains how claims, evidence and limits are presented.

This project is not affiliated with or endorsed by OpenAI.

Public sources

Biography checked against these public sources on October 13, 2026. Roles and affiliations are described only where supported by the cited source.

Explore the field journal

Make the next step useful

Professional focus, practical materials

Publicly sourced professional background and a direct path into the site’s practical materials.

Rachel Kent's public work connects education, accessible resources and community learning. AI Toolbox for Teachers documents a free resource collection for educators. The University at Buffalo's AI + Education series records her participation in a discussion of AI's ethical implications in education. WBFO's interview provides background on her teaching and Good Deed Grocery work.

Those public sources support the professional background described on this page. They do not certify this site's methods, establish outcomes for its exercises or imply endorsement by the organizations named.

What this journal adds

ChatwithGPT brings practical AI learning into a format that readers can inspect and reuse. Its Educator collection focuses on planning, materials, feedback and teacher-owned review. Agentic Systems explains tools, permissions and evaluation. Workspace Development explores context, source sets and consistent outputs.

The common thread is a small, checkable piece of work: define the goal, create a draft, examine the result and retain a useful next step. That describes the materials published here; it is not a claim that every method has been tested in a classroom or production setting.

Read the work and the evidence together

Start with the resource library for a method to try, the Work page for the public website's design decisions, or the journal for dated development notes. The editorial policy explains AI-assisted preparation, source attribution and the distinction between examples and measured results.

This is an independent project. Mentioned employers, organizations and tool providers do not sponsor, certify or endorse it unless a specific public statement says so.